-

From Wikileaks

Having reviewed the documents there is wife called Anita and a son Jörg Ulrich mentioned who are related to Dr. Hans Henning Atrott. There is also no valid reason to have an expensive Cayman Trust living in Andorra. It sounds really strange and we hope Dr Hans Henning Atrott can clarify the situation. It would be a piece of cake just to show that the Trust has been taxed or show the source of funds. Anyhow reading that the settlor is the main and the only beneficiary does not even constitute a Trust. It is very suspect but Dr. Hans Henning Atrott might be able to enlight society.

[edit] Ehrlichkeit - Moral - Vorbild der Gesellschaft

Es ist bedauerlich, dass solche grosse Menschen wie Sie Herr Atrott nicht mit der Ehrlichkeit umgehen können. In Frage stellen, negieren, kompliziert formulieren und alles was man Ihnen gesagt hatte, in dieser Sache zu tun. Sie sind zum Werkzeug geworden. Sie wissen dies. Sie müssen Ihr Verhalten und anderes mit Ihrem Gewissen vereinbaren, aber das fällt nicht leicht, ich weiss. Das Christentum kennt Gerechtigkeit und wir glauben daran, ich weiss, Sie nicht. Trotzdem hat Sie die Gerechtigkeit hier eingeholt, da nützen Anwälte, Klagen, Ausflüchte usw alles nichts. Die Gerechtigkeit ist hier und Sie wird in in den nächsten Tagen und Wochen weiter verfolgen. Wir hoffen, dass Sie damit umgehen können und auch in dieser Sache zum Vorbild der Gesellschaft werden.

Translation please? --WannaBeANerd 04:58, 30 June 2008 (GMT)

[edit] Where there is Christianity, there is Prosecution

Firstly, scrutinizing the document, I suspect this as a kind of "Constantine Donation" fabricated by perfidious Christians wanting to fling mud at Dr. Abrott. Dr. Abrott demands prohibition of Christian parties in Germany because of illegally favoring Christianity. This is the Christians' reaction! For example, the birth date of Mr. Abrott's son -- easy to get in the internet -- is mentioned; the one of his wife -- hardly to get -- is not.

Secondly, it stays the question and Wikileaks does not answer it: To what country Dr. Abrott evades taxes! To the U.S.A., Cayman Island, Andorra, Germany or Lithuania etc.? Before, Wikileaks cannot say to what country Dr. Abrott evades taxes; it should not stir up to hatred and vindictiveness on an innocent one but has to withdraw insulting "documents"...!

Thirdly, provided the document results from (the crime of) larceny, i.e. was authentic, it is not proven why such as trust should be a sham-trust and consequently, disallowed. Who allows trusts...? Who defines trusts...?

Fourthly, I noticed that this web page is manipulated. Many comments embarrassing Wikileaks are eliminated from here. That is no fair play! Wikileaks cannot stand criticism but what it demands from others to do! Double standards!

Fifthly, Dr. Abrott might be a role model demonstrating that a possibility of hiding money lawfully makes sense. Swiss banks introduced this possibility in the 1930ties when Jews were prosecuted in Germany. Dr. Abrott illegally was prosecuted by Christian-German government on instigation of Christian churches in Germany because he became very dangerous for Christian church. Christianity -- the world's most experienced prosecutor and killer of dissidents -- illegally deprived him of almost his fortune and wanted to drive him to suicide in order to make murder superfluous. What a pity to Christian prosecutors that Dr. Abrott knows all the dodges...!

Sixthly it is to assume that the Christian-German government so-gladly would have restarted prosecution on Dr. Abrott, already, if there would be something substantial on Wikileaks' accusations.

Wikileaks is very mistaken if believing that the Communists and/or Islam are the "evil" and the Western are the "good". As long as the Western are governed by the most enemy of human rights, i.e. Christianity, this belief means cracking joke! Where there is Christianity, there is prosecution! Where there prosecution of religious criminals, the prosecuted have the right to escape prosecution! It even is to question if prosecution of religious criminals constitutes a right of self-defense since it demonstrably takes about 2000 years until those criminals admit their crimes! Wikileaks belongs with the unfair and this action will damage Wikileaks much more than presumed, at the moment!

Minaugas Retelis

[edit] What is it all about?

It is simple to find out the truth if you consider the following questions/statments on the money matter:

1) Every ordinary man from the street does not need an expensive Trust in the Cayman Islands. Why does Mr Dr. Hans Henning Atrott need such a Trust when an ordinary Bank account at the place where he lives should be more than sufficient?

2) Why is Dr Hans Henning Atrott willing to pay USD 800 - 1'000 per hour to the Cayman Lawyers to setup the Trust?

3) Why is Dr Hans Henning Atrott the settlor and as proposed the sole beneficiary until he dies?

4) What is the purpose of such a Trust in a location such as the Cayman Islands other than using it for criminal matters?

5) Why is so much defending and justifying going on his part and attacking of Christianity required for justifiying his Trust?

Unfortunately, Peter E. Meier, is Mr. Dr Abtrott's relationship manager as stated in the documents and other information passed on to the authorities might trigger a serious investigation. However, it is all in Mr. Atrott's hands to clarify the situation publically when disclosing the source of funds and the purpose of his awkward Trust arrangement. He attacks Christianity publically as well and therefore it clarifying such simple matter should not create any headache, should it not?

Wikileaks will find the truth and the house of lies will be tired down!

[edit] First Investigation than Accusation

The comments confirm assumption that the attacks on Dr. Abtrott are in context with his criticism on Christianity. However, as in Christianity everything contradicts itself:

1) The activists of Wikileaks write, here: Wikileaks will find the truth and the house of lies will be tired down! You should do this first and afterwards accuse someone but not before. Here, it is admitted that Wikileaks without conclusive evidence accuses distinguished ones.

2) It is stated: "No ordinary man needs an account in the Cayman Island". However, Dr. Abtrott is attacked because he is no ordinary man. Otherwise, he would not be mentioned here!

3) Where are the receipt for that what Dr.Abtrott played for establishing a trust in the Cayman Island?

4) Why did Mr. Smiler or similar worked at Bank Baer in Cayman Island if "a location such as the Cayman Islands other than using it for criminal matters"? This would mean the larcenist deliberately assisted to criminals and their crimes! If it is about Wikileaks own criminality, for instance, aiding and abetting a larceny and a blackmailer wanting to extort his former employer, the societies are o.k. and there are only some evil criminals. Stop thief! In the same way, one could question: For what reasons but for covering crimes (of larceny), grudge, envy, hatred and vindictiveness such "information" is leaked by Wikileaks? For what reason but taking revenge on his former employer for being sacked Mr. Smiler commits crimes against Swiss and Cayman Island's laws obliging him to privacy?

5) Here, others are accused being criminals without evidence and fair trail but the evident criminals are the accusers!

6)"... information passed on to the authorities might trigger a serious investigation" - why is there no "serious investigation of Dr. Abtrott although pressed in this manner by Wikileaks?

7) It is concealed that Dr. Abtrott indeed unjustly and unfairly was prosecuted by Christian-German Government. The Germans are already experienced in such prosecutions, e.g. in prosecuting the Jews for similar reasons.

8) It is a matter of course if the accusations on Dr. Abtrott would be correct that he indeed would surpass the Christians' CONSTANTINE DONATION, i.e. the most offence on property on human race perpetrated by Christianity. By the latter Christian church tricked, shifted and grifted:

- A whole state (church state in Middle Italy) - Huge properties, almost the West European continent - The "right" to appoint all clerical and political leaders to grant impunity to Christian church etc. etc. etc.

When those properties where taken away from the church in the 18th century, the Christian clergies asked for compensation and got it. Since until the present day, people in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland and even in parts of France have to pay taxes directly to the church. What depraved are the banks taking money from humankind's top larcenists?

I assume that Dr. Abtrott wanted to dodge paying his enemies via Cayman Island, if Wikileaks claims should be no feint.

Dear commenter, none of the statements found on this page have been made by Wikileaks. This is an open discussion and all of the above has been contributed by visitors of this portal. So much for the false accusations ;)

[edit] It is not about revenge, it is about HUMANITY !!!

This is the report from Richard Murphy (He graduated in Economics and Accountancy from Southampton University; he was articled to Peat Marwick Mitchell & Co in London. He specialised in tax before setting up his own firm in 1985. In 1989 the firm became Murphy Deeks Nolan, Chartered and Certified Accountants of which he was Senior Partner until he and his partners sold the then 800 client firm in 2000), der weitere Hintergründe zeigt, aber auch Gültigkeit für die Schweiz hat.

“I spoke at the meeting calling for tax justice in London this evening, supported by a wide range of organisations. This is what I said:

We have already heard this evening of the need for tax justice for a great many people who live in this country. I wholeheartedly agree with what has been said. But there are some people who need tax justice even more than we do. They are the people of the developing countries of this world. For them tax justice is right now a matter of life and death and no one can say that of anyone here in the UK.

But we should have absolutely no doubt that this is an issue for the UK. The reason is simple. It is our tax havens, our banks and financial services companies and our multinational enterprises that play a central role in creating tax injustice for the majority of people in this world.

It is of course very hard to prove just how much money is lost to developing countries as a result of the exploitation of tax havens. However my friend and colleague Raymond Baker, based at the Brookings Institution, has prepared estimates that the World Bank thinks are the best available. He says that illicit money flows, almost all of them through tax havens, cost the developing world between $500 billion and $800 billion a year. To put that in context, aid amounts to just over $100 billion a year.

Of those illicit flows just 3% relate to corruption of the sort that the popular press says is destroying developing countries. 30% may relate to crime like drug trafficking, but by far the largest part relates to organised tax avoidance and evasion. Worse, the corruption and criminal behaviour uses exactly the same mechanisms that the tax avoiders and evaders use.

Those mechanisms were not created by chance. The UK is a tax haven. The IMF says so. The UK has also created more tax havens than any other country on earth. Jersey, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Gibraltar, Cayman, Bermuda, the British Virgin Islands, the list goes on. And they are all ours. If you find a home for corruption we probably made it.

All these places have one thing in common. They set out to create laws that are intended to undermine the tax system or regulation of another country. That is an act of economic warfare. We let them do that.

But of course people say it takes two to tango. And they’re right. Tax havens would be useless without the financial services companies that operate within them. It is these companies that make up the offshore financial centres that supply the mechanisms used for corruption, crime, tax evasion and tax avoidance in the developing world.

You know the names of some of the people who operate in these places. I am a chartered accountant. The big four firms that dominate my profession, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Ernst & Young and Deloitte’s, operate in every major tax haven in the world and most of the minor ones. They are all in Lichtenstein, for example, and not one of them can explain why. Our well-known banks are nearly as widespread within the tax haven world.

It is these pillars of our society who are helping their clients undermine the tax revenues of the developing countries of this world. And it is these people who argue for tax cuts for their corporate clients. They suggest that VAT be charged instead. There is only one outcome: the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. We have to presume that that is what they want.

Worse, even though I have no doubt that everything these firms do is legal they do create the complex structures that mean that tax is not paid in developing countries. And by their presence in tax havens they give legitimacy to those places that helps hide the illegal exploitation that is based there.

The consequence is clear. As Ray Baker has put it, over the last 30 years or so we have created a tax system that has for the first time in recent history guaranteed that money flows from the poor to the rich and from the poorest nations to the richest nations. And I would stress once again: that is not an accident, this is by design. Tax havens are central to that design, the offshore financial centres based in those tax havens and populated by the world’s largest financial services companies are the architects of this system.

A fortnight ago the Tax Justice Network submitted its evidence to the Treasury select committee that is holding hearings on offshore financial centres. 73,000 words of evidence. But you can summarise it very simply. This abuse of humanity has to end. We cannot see tax systems in the developing world undermined to the point that children die, as Christian Aid have shown they do. We cannot have a world where tax havens assist people to take five times total aid flows out of the developing world. We cannot build sustainable democratic countries free of corruption whilst we provide the mechanisms to undermine them.

What I am pleased to tell you is that we do not have to put up with this. We in the Tax Justice Network think that the problem without a solution is a statement of fact. A problem with a solution is something we can address. In our 73,000 words sent to the Treasury select committee were 18 recommendations for change that the UK could make to tackle this issue. We can offer many more internationally.

Of course the world’s bankers, lawyers and accountants will tell us that what we are asking for is not possible. My answer is simple. I am a chartered accountant. I don’t believe them. I know that change is possible. They don’t want to change: they are winning from the world as it is. In fact, they are the problem with the world as it is.

In that case let me assure you, there is no market-based solution to this problem. If our government believes in democracy, believes in helping the developing world, believes in ending aid dependency, believes in fairness, transparency, accountability and cutting crime: if our government believes in giving tax breaks to those who need them, but not to the criminals, tax evaders and tax avoiders who don’t, then our government has no choice. The time has come to break open the secrecy that allows tax havens to pursue their sordid crime on society. As I have said, this could be done. But there is one vital component that we cannot deliver alone. And that is the political will.

Working together the organisations here tonight can help build that political will. That is why I am so pleased to see you all. But our message to our politicians must be an ambiguous one: it is this. Listen to the ordinary people of the world and act as if you were one of them. If you did you would close the world’s tax havens tomorrow.

Please do it.“

Do you now understand what it is all about Mr A?

[edit] This is an attack on the sovereignty of the countries

Each country has to right to fix its own taxes and punishment for tax evasion. Each country even has the right to open a competition for the smallest taxes. In addition, each citizen has the right to protect his fortune by a state he deems to be the best protection. Everything else is despotism and dictatorship. What you write are lesson for ignoramuses. You cant your grudge, hatred and vindictiveness on the rich like Mr. Eilmer -- or similar -- from Bank Baer does! Larcency of private data are no recommandation for your views.

Minaugas Ritelis

[edit] There is no Humanity to achieve by Crimes and Criminals

Criminals belong behind bars. Nobody is allowed to decide by his own by what laws of his country he abides and what he presumes to break! All organized crimes canted their abomination (Nazi, Communism) canted their abomination like Herr Eimer does so. By the way, I am not Mr. Abtrott

1.0.22.53

[edit] Brilliant Defence Strategy to bring sovereignty and Crimes into play

Please get real and think about why would you have a Trust in the Cayman Islands, why Julius Baer is now investigated by several authorties, why Julius Baer clients have run to the tax authorities and declared their past offshore income. Maybe due to humanitarian reasons!

It is easy to use those catch phrases "This is an attack on the sovereignty of the countries" and "there is no Humanity to achieve by Crimes and Criminals" this is just a technique to move away from reality. Think global as you do when you try to make your money my friend! Trying to find support bringing the rich into play is another attempt to get away from the main point. There are many rich people who do not have Offshore accounts in order to avoid taxes and for other crimes and the others are responsible for the misery in developping countries have to face at least one or the other way. That's reality! The sovereignty has its weak points and taxes justice is one of them!

In my view Mr Elmer is an ethcial dissident who brings things to light which we all know they are there and they have to be changed in order to make another step in the direction of humanity and global justice! Maybe he is a criminal but Nelson Mandela, Ghandi, Martin Luther King went all to prison due to people who could not accept the truth.

[edit] Offshore Funds and its drawbacks!

It is an embarrassing task of admitting to the tax authorities, other authorities or another Fiancial Institution that one or one of his/her ancestors had committed crimes during their lifetime.

This arrangement suited the Banks/trustees very well, and continues to do so. The moment offshore money is tainted by tax evasion or another crime it has to stay there or the settlor and, maybe, the beneficiaries have to admit to a crime because taken the funds away means to prove the source of funds to another financial service provider. This is hard to do these days. Therefore, few are willing to do that and so are locked into a perpetual cycle of paying the offshore agent's fees which benefits the Banks/trustees. It is a wicked and pernicious trade that lives on the back of crime.

I think you are describing the problems according to fable of the fox and grapes. You confuse your arbitrary suppositions with evidence. I assume if trusts firstly would be that bad nobody would furnish them and secondly you would not need a thief and extortioner like, for example, Mr. Elmer from BJB as source of your right or wrong "information" whose crimes you spin-doctor. You ridiculously think that tax evasion which, for instance, in Switzerland only is a misdemeanor is the most severe crime as taking part in the crimes of Guantanamo or in Nazi concentration camps. Even famous socialists like, for instance, August Bebel, were such tax evasors. The latter left about 600.000 (six hundred thousands) Gold Marks in Switzerland when he died... This is a very good contribution to the evilness of the "rich" and the "decency" of the poor and their advocates... The socialists are tainted with such "crimes"... The most danger on humanity comes from people like you blaming others firstly for non-evident "crimes" and secondly fixing arbitrarily what a crime is and what not while canting the criminality of the thieves of your information. You imagination of crime is only to apply to some countries and each country has to right to define that as crime what it thinks right doing so. Missionaries, please stop your efforts to graft your "notion" of "crime" upon everybody! The most danger on humanity comes from people like you taking liberty to justify evident crimes that support your views (e. g that one of Mr. Elmer of BJB) and condemning those fancied ones that only insult your grudge and envy! People like you are the most danger to humanity because they are impervious to reason and impervious to the truths. I guess like a religious terrorist you rather would die than admitting that your notion of crime is just rubbish.

[edit] Not only a Case of the Sovereignty of other Countries but also of everybody's Equality to the Law"

When the Germans raided Belgium in WW I and WW II, the then Geman cancellor called Belgium's sovereignty "a scrap of paper for which the Germans cannot care..." I do not know what you think whom I am. Dr. Abtrott has more friends you imagine, indeed from all over the world, as well in the West as in the East! You perpetrate self-justice when accusing Dr.Abtrott to evade taxes. Where is an investigation on him? If one could indict Dr. Abtrott in that way, German und Christian newspaper would be full of such “news”? Please provide any evidence that Dr. Abtrott is evading taxes before accusing him! I also think that you lost contact to reality when comparing a thief of private data and blackmailer with Nelson Mandela, Mahatma Gandhi. Do not make me laugh…! If somebody is to compare in that way, then it is Dr. Abtrott, whom the Christian-German government lawlessly prosecuted at the instigation of Christian church! It also is German custom, which can be proved by history, that the German governments do not respect sovereignty of their neighboring states. The current German government repeated such crimes when trying to force Liechtenstein and Switzerland to swallow German tax laws without contradiction. This is a crime on the sovereignty on other countries and instigation to self-justice what the German-Christian government knows when providing – by the way, unlawfully -- new names and German passports to the thieves. How long have immigrants from Africa to wait in order to get a German passport if they get one or become deported from Germany…? The German government is lawless and covers its crimes by media propaganda conditioning the people to believe what is false! The Germans always wanted to graft their laws upon their neighbors and if the latter did not want to comply with them, the Germans often raided them. This is German ideology of Arian “superman” which the Nazis carried out, at most.

You allegations of investigation on Bank Baer (Switzerland) is a dream because unlike its disloyal and criminal dismissed employee (N.E. or similar) it complies with the laws of the countries where is it based and German laws end at the German frontiers. No company in the world could exist if it would have to comply with all tax laws of all the states of planet earth. Everybody is a criminal if he has to abide by all laws of all states of the globe . One only has to abide by the laws where one lives. Otherwise, everybody would be a criminal. You do not see the premises of your claims: that there purportedly is a universal tax law enacted by the United Nations by which each citizen of planet earth has to abide. Only on this presupposition you can fling mud of being “criminals” on others that easily as you are doing!

There are economical researches of scientists having got a Nobel prices that tax evasion increases if more than 35 per cent is to pay. The US-government complied with this knowledge and changed its tax laws in the 1980ties. Germany still takes up to 90 per cent. Everything else is German juggling in writing-off taxes. There are “social” political parties believing that they can take what they want from the rich as long as everybody is not poor. It is about a naive fallacy since those “socialists” or Christians do not take into account that most rich people can leave their country and can live almost everywhere in the world. Out of bounds, out of taxes!

This also is my reproach on Wikileaks that is provides a platform form stirring hatred on accused ones without having proven if there is any substance about the indictments. The inference of having an account in Grand Cayman and evading taxes is a fallacy of nerds and jerks. Hereby Wikileaks is going to become a sordid gossip. In addition, Wikileaks loses support of people which could be important. Hence, reputable American societies rightly rejected to join the boad of Wikileaks for precisely those reasons!

The same goofiness is to state when current German government wants to argue its bribe for thieves of about 4 millions of Euros compared to that what it got (by covering up tax evasion), in the meantime. If only three rich German families now leave their country what happens noiselessly, the balance in the long run is very negative. In addition, it is to doubt that German government successfully prevents self-justice it criminally instigates when providing the criminals (thieves of private data, blackmailers) with new names and passports. The enemies of the government also could not only see the thieves and blackmailers but also individuals who aided and abetted those criminals. In German there is a saying: The distinguished have a long remembrance! There is no government forever. One day, those individuals will not be in office, any longer, i.e. protected by body guards 24 hours a day. So, I want to ask: Where is the end if a government starts perpetrating crimes in order to pursue its citizen...? Everybody has to abide by the law. Everything else is a speculation that the victim keeps decency and honesty one does not keep (oneself). At the end, there will be the law of the jungle. Therefore, I take the view that everybody, i.e. also a Christian and/or German government, has to abide by the laws or nobody has to do so.

According to Jean Jacques Rousseau the individual gives up his own sovereignty in favor of the state. In exchange, the state protects the individual according to equal laws with which everybody has to comply. If a government does not comply with the laws and lawlessly prosecutes citizen, this “contract social” is broken and everybody can care for his freedom of his own as he considers it to be expedient as he has to do in "natural condition", i.e. without a society or state. That is the jungle of law, those criminals disguised or fooling themselves as “upholders of moral standards” deliberately or inadvertently are striving for. I.e. the German government does not only perpetrate crimes on the sovereignty of other countries by forcing them to swallow their laws, it also perpetrates crimes on the human right of everybody's equality to the law! Pertaining to your comparison of this sordid criminal N.E. (because of his grudge, hatred and vindictiveness) on the rich, you should remember that the communists also pretended to strive for very good ideals (against the rich and for the poor) but they failed to do so because no ideal is to accomplish by crimes. It ended up in the Gulag. In addition, there is a sect on planet earth claiming that a felon of its own suffered death penalty for the “sins” of his fellows but all I can see is that this purported “sacrifice” was the signal for planet earth’s most thieves and murderers. It perpetrated several genocides on the Jews because they purportedly are greedy and rich and in addition murdered about 300.000.000 other people. I.e., N.E. (from Bank Julius Baer) is not the first criminal fooling himself as “upholder of moral standards” if not as “savior of humankind”… Hatred on the rich always had been “idealized” as utmost commitment to “moral standards” but turned out as most criminality of human race. Finally, they demonstrated that this is the only language they understand! And it still stays the unanswered question: To what country Dr. Abtrott allegedly evades taxes?

[edit] Not only a Case of UNJUSTICE caused by Sovereignty but also of everybody's Unequality to TAX Law"

This is a striking example for society that sovereignty in tax matters creates unjustice not only in Europe but also in the rest of the world. It realy demonstrates the limitation of tax law and sovereignty which is responsible for unequality to Tax Law within the society. Read this again and visit Mr. Raymaond Bakers website in order to being enlighted “Raymond Baker, based at the Brookings Institution, has prepared estimates that the World Bank thinks are the best available. Raymond Baker says that illicit money flows, almost all of them through tax havens, cost the developing world between $500 billion and $800 billion a year. To put that in context, aid amounts to just over $100 billion a year.” Therefore, we care about “equality to the law”, we also care about “equality to the law in tax matters” because in tax matters it does not exist. Therefore, this is here only about equality in tax matters and not about hatred of the rich, Germans and the jews as implied. There are many rich people who do not required an offshore account. It is just a simplification! It is about sovereignty and tax matters and unjustice. If there are millions of people and children who are starving partly because of those tax havens and people hidding funds there we will disclose and make society know who

• In our society benefits from those tax havens, soververeignty in tax matters and • the people are who place funds for obvious and strange or even criminal reasons in tax havens because . ''''the ordinary man has no bank account in the Cayman Islands or in another tax haven!''''

We all know but we do not admit the law is not designed to deliver justice. The law is not even ethical and moral as you rightly mentioned but in tax matters over the years it has become a crime protected by sovereignty, bank secrecy and other adverse practice. The tax practice has become the means by which those in power, justly or unjustly, retain power and money. On the other hand others have to suffer due to the the money flows from the poor to the rich through those tax havens and people hidding funds there. The tax law and sovereignity here preserves power, money and most importantly unjustice. As you know law will nearly always dignify as a past evil as precedent rather than create justice. Therefore, this case is only one of many striking examples and stand for many others to come.

We think it should be up to each individual holding funds in tax havens to prove that these are legally obtained funds and not funds are placed there for tax or whatever strange reasons. For your information the president of Mexico Salinas was prosecuted because he could not prove the souce of his fortune! It turned out the prosecutors were right! Maybe such an approach might be partly of a solution to force justice related to those cases in tax havens going to be published soon e.g. US Office of Investgation to the Senate US.

Above statement “No company in the world could exist if it would have to comply with all tax laws of all the states of planet earth. Everybody is a criminal if he has to abide by all laws of all states of the globe only shows the ignorance. It is an attempt to justify the reasoning and the conduct of others. There are many companies who comply with the tax law on the planet earth and there are many people who comply with the tax laws on the planet earth and are no criminals. It is about time to show who does not or who appears to do so and who benefits from the tax havens.

All changes will never be perfect and those will even create unjustice again, however, it is a move in the right direction to improve justice and maybe even humanity. Anyhow, we will make this case one of the many famous cases to discuss publically and maybe even invite Mr Atrott particularly to the Spanish television in order to present his view to millions of spectators. On the other hand it is believed it would not be fair to single out Mr. Atrott who we admire for all his work and therefore many more will be disclosed from famous surgeons to European politicians!

May we draw your attention to the article again where it says Mr Atrott appears and an investigations should take place and we do not know why it is assumed that Mr Atrott does not comply with the law. Maybe it has to be assumed?

[edit] The Germans are much more reliable if is about indicting and jailing the enemies of Christianity

I read all these things already half a year ago. I am a Christian from Sevillia (Spain) and already looked forward to an investigation on this enemy of Christianity, here in Spain. However, I never read or heard about one. The Germans are much more reliable if it is about indicting and jailing the enemies of our beloved religion. We should bring Atrott back to Germany. Our Socialist government does nothing against him...